Skip to main content

How to Write a Fair Book Review

Do you write book reviews? I write them on Goodreads, NetGalley for the advanced reader copies(ARC) that I get for honest reviews, and on my Instagram account. I sometimes leave reviews on Amazon too.

I've only ever written one bad review - bad as in I gave it 1 star. In the main I don't leave 1-3 star reviews because I assume that it's just not a book for me. The one negative review I did write was for something that should never have been published. There were continuity issues, poor copyediting, unrealistic characters and plot, and the dialogue was stilted and unrealistic. There was little positive you could say about the book. I only finished it because I was on holiday and had little else with me to read.

All the other reviews I give tend to be 4-5 star reviews because I'm selective in what I read. I look at the reviews other people leave and I find myself wondering why they written what they did. There are 1 star reviews where people comment that 'this just wasn't my kind of book' - er, well, then it's not a 1 star, is it? It's a poor choice! And then there's the reviews that don't tell me what the person thinks about the book, rather they tell me the story - oh come on! If I want to know the story I'll read it. And spoilers, really, did you have to give away the crucial twist so that it takes away the mystery of the first 200+ pages? Where's that face palm emoji?

How, then, do you write a fair book review? Here are my tips.

Let's start first with the things not to leave a review about:

  • If you found part way through that you chose a book that just isn't for you, don't blame the writer for that. Simply move on. Nothing to review here.
  • If you didn't finish, for whatever reason, that's not the writer's fault. Again, nothing to review.
  • If there was a problem with the delivery of the book, contact the seller. Delivery issues is not what reviews are for. When you leave a 1 star review for something that has nothing to do with the writer you are affecting their rating. Don't do that.
Ok, now let's look at the things to put in your review:
  • Did you enjoy the story? Say so. Include 3 things that you particularly liked. Did you connect with the main character of the story? Were you carried along with the pace? Was it written in a way that made you want to know more? Was it a page turner?
  • What do you think others will like about the book? Is it a love story that you can lose yourself in when you're sitting on the beach on holiday? Does the twist make you hold your breath? Are you willing the protagonist to defeat the demons (inner demons just as much as actual demons)?
  • Are you looking forward to reading more from this author?
  • Would you recommend the book to others? If so, what kind of genre does it fall into? People who love YA or romance novels are probably not going to enjoy a psychological thriller, and those who love historical fiction may not be so keen on sci-fi or fantasy.
What you can leave out of your review:
  • It's not necessary to tell people the number of pages in the book - there's enough on-line information to tell them this without you using it as a filler for your review,
  • If there's something in the book that you think others won't like (abortion, religion, murder, sexual abuse etc) it's not for you to decide for them that something will upset or offend them. My mum wouldn't read Eleanor Oliphant is Completely Fine because someone had written in their review that it was about child sexual abuse. She won't believe me that it's not at all about that. As a result, she has missed out on reading a truly beautiful story. Leave others to decide to put a book down if it's not for them.
And finally, how long does a review need to be? In truth, as long as you want. However I find when I'm reading reviews that I generally only read the first paragraph or so. Which means that shorter reviews are maybe of more value. I tend to go for between 1 and 2 paragraphs. The better the book, the more likely I'll go into the second paragraph.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Write What You Know, Or So They Say

Since school days, when my love for writing and reading started to mature under the tutelage of Mrs Hymers, I've been told to write what I know. Let's face it, though, you're not really that interested in a novel about an NHS programme manager. Silly though it sounds, I've only recently attuned to what the phrase means. It's not referring to my profession or what I do, but rather it's about writing from a place of knowing. If you know Liverpool like the back of your hand, then write about it, but if you've never been there it's maybe better to concentrate a place that you do know. However I realise there is something else about 'write what you know' and this place of knowing, and that's the role of research. It's ok for me to research something to the point where when I write about it, you think I have written about what I know. Take the photograph at the top of this post. Flowers in a jug sitting on hessian. What do you know about ...

Living with Mother

When mum was my age she refused to look after my daughter. A toddler of 3 who needed collecting from private nursery 2 days a week, and taking to the nursery at the school she'd be attending. Mum said no, that was too much to ask. She'd seen how tired grandparents got looking after their grandchildren and 'knew what it was like' for these people she observed in cafes or walking around the park. ‘It isn’t fair to ask someone of 59 to do that,’ she'd say. It's a lot to ask of old people that they look after their grandchildren. I’m 59. I’m all my mum has left. I look after her, working full time, and she's right. I’m tired looking after her. But the big difference is that as I look after her, she's only going to get older and needs more and more 'looking after'. Had my mum looked after my daughter, she would only have got older and needed less 'looking after'. For the last 5 years we've WhatsApp'd every morning, so that I know she’s...

The Plotting Writer

  When I first started to write I just wrote, let the words flow with no idea where my story was going to go, and only the hint of something in my head about what I might write. I let the ideas develop themselves. Then I came across the 'Snowflake' method which got me thinking about how I could at least have an outline of a plan. And that's what got me realising that I work much better with a plan. From there I learned about having a flatplan from Holly Dawson through a webinar she ran for Jericho Writers. I now have little prompts (you can just make them out in the photo above) which have the chapter, place, date, character list, what happens, and what the purpose of the chapter is. Using these prompts helps me to get my ideas out of my head. And more importantly they help me to keep working on my structure, making sure that everything fits together the way it needs to.  By using this approach I spotted some glaring errors in my timeline, and realised that I had one of my ...